Where I'd Put the Next Hour of Work: A Gap Map of AI Safety
Where would an hour of independent work do the most good in AI safety? A gap map, a test for my main hypothesis, and how I would choose a first project.
Field notes on brand identity in the age of AI.
Where would an hour of independent work do the most good in AI safety? A gap map, a test for my main hypothesis, and how I would choose a first project.
A person in the loop is not a safeguard by definition. The arithmetic of how much review it takes to catch a rare failure, and what a checkable oversight claim looks like.
Safety tests built in English may not travel to Darija, Arabic or French. The evidence, what is missing, and a pre-registered pilot I would run.
Aviation learns from near-misses. AI mostly learns from screenshots. What a near-miss report for deployers would need, sketched against three public chatbot cases.
A compute threshold is a tripwire for paperwork, not a verdict on risk. The arithmetic of why fixed lines age, and a layered design that expects to be revised.
A model passed its dangerous-capability test. What can you conclude? Four ways a pass misleads, and a seven-question rubric for reading one.
The Collingridge dilemma, two California bills, and what a decision record for rules made under uncertainty could look like.
Open weights, open source and the EU's exemptions are three different things. What the difference means for safety, and how I would structure a release decision.
Never miss a post